<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Nav</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.visible-form.com/blog/bad-nav/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.visible-form.com/blog/bad-nav/</link>
	<description>Rich Rodecker's blog on flash, flex, actionscript, javascript, and php, with a dash of randomness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:06:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MOLOKO</title>
		<link>http://www.visible-form.com/blog/bad-nav/comment-page-1/#comment-3235</link>
		<dc:creator>MOLOKO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visible-form.com/blog/bad-nav/#comment-3235</guid>
		<description>I can what they&#039;ve done here - they&#039;ve tried to rip off/borrow from/pay homage to the UI design from the very lovely Mac app &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.steelskies.com/coverflow/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CoverFlow&lt;/a&gt;.
But sadly they&#039;ve not implemented their version anything like as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can what they&#8217;ve done here &#8211; they&#8217;ve tried to rip off/borrow from/pay homage to the UI design from the very lovely Mac app <a href="http://www.steelskies.com/coverflow/" rel="nofollow">CoverFlow</a>.<br />
But sadly they&#8217;ve not implemented their version anything like as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.visible-form.com/blog/bad-nav/comment-page-1/#comment-3215</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visible-form.com/blog/bad-nav/#comment-3215</guid>
		<description>You are right, it is bloody awful. The idea is sound, but the execution is terrible. Navigating through the screen shots seems to be off target, if you know what I mean, and once you click on one a pop up appears, urgh!...and to top it off it is not even the screen shot you were expecting...for example the Pinky &amp; the Brain screen...click on it and where is that screen? bad, bad, bad. And once you have closed the pop up (because you were dissapointed that it isn&#039;t have the shot you were expecting) you have to find where you were last! 

I am sorry if I  sound too opinionated, but I think you could heed my comments and do a better job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, it is bloody awful. The idea is sound, but the execution is terrible. Navigating through the screen shots seems to be off target, if you know what I mean, and once you click on one a pop up appears, urgh!&#8230;and to top it off it is not even the screen shot you were expecting&#8230;for example the Pinky &amp; the Brain screen&#8230;click on it and where is that screen? bad, bad, bad. And once you have closed the pop up (because you were dissapointed that it isn&#8217;t have the shot you were expecting) you have to find where you were last! </p>
<p>I am sorry if I  sound too opinionated, but I think you could heed my comments and do a better job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.visible-form.com/blog/bad-nav/comment-page-1/#comment-3210</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visible-form.com/blog/bad-nav/#comment-3210</guid>
		<description>It has the potential to be a usable navigation with some tweaking. By shoving all the other screenshots into the background when one receives focus, it becomes unwieldy. A better approach would be to keep the unfocused screenshots in place and to bring only the focused one forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has the potential to be a usable navigation with some tweaking. By shoving all the other screenshots into the background when one receives focus, it becomes unwieldy. A better approach would be to keep the unfocused screenshots in place and to bring only the focused one forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
